A verdict tells you whether to worry. It doesn’t tell you why. We wrote about this before in Inside the Malware: What Reverse Engineering Insights Reveal, which walked through what reverse engineering exposes once a threat is already in front of an analyst: how it keeps a foothold on a machine, what conditions it’s waiting […]
An EDR flags an artifact. That part takes a second. What happens next can take hours, days, and sometimes even weeks. An analyst opens a sandbox to detonate it. Pulls up threat intel to check for prior sightings. Starts a manual reverse engineering pass if the first two come back inconclusive. Opens a ticket to […]
The Claim Governance frameworks that treat package name recognition and maintainer history as ongoing proof of safety create systemic risk when a compromised artifact can behave differently depending on where it executes. Zero Trust for Code addresses this by requiring a pre-execution trust decision on what a package will do in a specific environment, rather […]
The Claim Governance frameworks that treat automated code review as sufficient validation create systemic risk when trust is granted based on what a scanner can see rather than what an artifact will do once an agent acts on it. Zero Trust for Code addresses this by requiring a pre-execution trust decision on what a merged […]
